Musician [9] 2016-01-28 18:18:23
You're wrong. That is, only one class can carry you, and the Hunter ... let's count. 1. Crete AU - takes 1-2
2. Tank AU - carries 1-2
3. Crete AK should be playing a draw, according to you. And if he wears the brilliance, will he take it away? 4. Tank AK - carries twice if inserted diamonds.
5. Vert AK - occasionally fights back.
Buddy, who do you want to hit?

if that's the way it should be, then why do we need a knight class?

why? if the Hunter easily restrains the destroyer ) for the sake of one Warrior to rock the Knight? Plus, as shown by the practice (Pels) who dressed the Knight - noted that they critique him more often than in the Hunter. The conclusion does not hold the Knight Crete and especially does not cope with the twists. and does not keep it because of the smaller number of twists in the kit than in the Hunter, so the presence there ak - does not pull it out as a class.

yes, and the chance of 25-30% - very high. as practice shows - there is no chance of winning... at least one fight I find on the 9th, where the Destroyer killed the Hunter!

Or show me one knight on level 9

And about unbelief - you have to dress and walk, I dressed with topazes ... critique only on the way. . .

The joke is that on the test it is, but on the basis everything looks very different ... and + 165 mf to the dodge (from the stones) - pulls the chances of winning close to 100%

In the same VP, I get into a fight once, and sometimes I do not get into it at all.
With the current formulas, the hunter has too much twist, so they calmly roll three classes, not two, like all the others. This is the only question.

the statistics are:
1. Templars - 7 pcs
2. Hunters - 6 pcs
3. Destroyer - 5 pcs
4. Warrior - 4 pcs
5. Gladiator - 2 pcs
6. Knight 1st, and that cake :

Ok, take another of my anticlass - the Templar in art - I will demolish it with 200-300 (and full art count), and VP (not full art) - cuts to zero, and not being my direct anticlass.
I'm not for getting the steering wheel, I'm for fairness in battle... and against one class taking three classes. . .

https://capitalcity.icombats.ru/log/1073940?page=1 - here's an entertaining log :) one punch, and a ring like one he still had

https://capitalcity.icombats.ru/log/1069910?page=4 - two hits and then without crits, apparently the hunter and warrior have a lot of anticrite :

It all depends on the stones. And ak-krits with diamonds can fight verts au. But you are by virtue of the fact that you are inserted on how you will make these crits how to carry out much more effectively, which I tried to convey with the main post. In chaot, the main thing is patience and searching for your enemies. - and here we come to the most interesting ... krita ak +165 in au does not give anything, without rings on au ... precisely because of the fact that the vortex is imbalansen, the shavings in the top, the clothes on au in the top. The hunter sets a trend in the game, and so it should not be that one class drags the whole movement behind it. :

One more question, on the stones.
As practice shows, the anti modifier works much more effectively than the profile parameter, for example, 10 mf antivorost works many times more effectively than 10 mf twist, the same with the crit. Does it not make sense to raise rubies and emeralds in profile stones 2 times the issued mf than in topazes and brils.
i.e. Emerald and ruby 10mf, topaz and shaving 5. Perfect ruby and emerald 20, topaz and shave 10. This somewhat compensates for the distortion with anti-mf.

that matchmaking, then unlucky - too much luck Hunter :) - he drags!!! imba, albeit not very pronounced, although from my point of view - strongly.
This is just a couple of highlights I've picked, in fact, in battle - Hunter is more confident than anyone else.

It's not true, the dodges have always been in the top... In battles with OV, or caves, yes, they concede, but in chaos - no and never conceded.