My dearest friends.
There is such a thing (may have heard) as banal ethics.
I understand that you are using images made to my order for paladins in another project. God be with him, forget it.

But I am very upset when prices and explanations about my authorship from the closed Paladin forum of this “other project” are here. With minor changes and paraphrasing.

I'm talking about topics.
Price on silent chat (Acting from 04.11.2015) (Forum)
Mat (forum)

Compare say with https://yadi.sk/i/QTEb1zXKkFRKD


Who these very topics leaked - let's leave behind the scenes, I would not like to think about my dear friend Personality. But I do not understand, given that I have not been approached for help, advice, advice or bluntly asked to use my intellectual property – where are these documents from?
Now to the administration. If you have appointed a supreme person who is unable to compile the simplest normative documents himself - it is your business, master of the master. But the general position on the topic of frank... let’s say borrowing is very interesting. Maybe it's part of party politics, and I'm crucified. . .

Thank you in advance.

Good afternoon, dear!

It is difficult to perceive such an attempt at criticism from the former paladin of a dead project.
I cannot say anything about the images used, since I do not know who painted them, who poured them, etc., and, unfortunately, you have not provided evidence of your involvement in their appearance anywhere.
On ethics.
I do not understand your claims and statements, given that you play in BC, and not the original. Your alleged authorship of documents has the same relation as mine to the project icombats.ru posted on the forum. I also doubt that you are the owner of these files. Just like they're licked off your scan. The text has been revised and edited to the extent necessary for use in the project. Just like you did in your dead project. Just like you and thousands of other players or hundreds of paladins did. Not because someone is difficult or lazy, but because it is impossible to invent a bicycle with an already patented unit. I hope I have explained to you the position on the topic of all frank borrowings in all active, live and popular projects.
In conclusion, I hasten to answer that you have not been contacted for help, advice or advice, simply because your help is not required here.
With respect, OS.

1. your comments on the deadness or vivacity of that project have absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter. Regardless of the status and success of the game (by the way, online which is still more than here, so it is a little early to discuss who is dead who is not), but the essence of the question does not change.
2. Sorry, but I am deeply purple about your doubts about the authorship of these documents, simply because you do not have even a minimal expertise in this matter, having not the slightest experience of moderation in such projects. I, being a white paladin in the original project of 2003-2004, twice - the supreme paladin in the project you know, holding senior positions in moderation structures in other games - in general, having 10 years of experience in leadership positions in similar structures, I once again declare that the authorship of these documents is mine.
3. As for the already invented bicycle, I recommend at least a little study of matchmaking and find out what the borrowing index is. Google help. It is clear that the word does not cease to be obscene depending on the author of the topic, but you did not even bother to paraphrase these materials, writing them from yourself. Your words about reworking and editing are outright lies, which is very easy to see by comparing the topic on the forum of your project and my screenshot. They are the same as the typos.

4. An outright lie for VP on the forum is amusing.

5. I wasn’t even more interested in your opinion – of course, it will be “what, I didn’t steal anything, anyway, everything is sticking with each other, that I just at once.” I was interested in the opinion of the administration regarding the professional suitability of their employee.

Thank you

p.S. Yes, by the way

It is difficult to accept such an attempt at criticism from the former paladin of a dead project. I>

before trying to show off on the forum, it would be nice to find out the situation at all. Such factual errors all the rest of the text trivial level. I mean, paladin I'm pretty good at it

I see that the adequacy of the conversation can only be dreamed of. Your emotions so much overshadow your thoughts that you can not continue the conversation calmly.
In the future, try to express your thoughts calmly and constructively, otherwise your behavior causes bewilderment and questions in your competence as a paladin with such “rich”, as you wrote above, experience. And then such stuffing on the forum level all your so saturated with "authority" text.

Regarding the situation, I do not write anything that I have not understood in detail and could not confirm my words with facts. If I write that the project is dead, it means that I have watched the project die for at least a year. Namely, the outflow of players, the inaction of the administration, lawlessness and so on. I also doubt the high online, which you are so confident about, since I saw it many times smaller than I was at the start here. If you like to "dance on the bones" - this is your right and no one takes it away from you. If you consider such a project alive, it is also your right, but my opinion differs from yours. I did not try to replace him or offend him in any way.

I mean, if you want your words to be accepted on faith, you need to show some respect for the interlocutor and do not think that everything around you is stupider than you. At least it doesn't make you look good. Otherwise, your words lose all force in the conversation and are perceived simply as an attempt to deceive or exaggerate. Especially since everyone knows what is going on and where. Do you want to make a beautiful face in a bad game? In poker, it can and will work, I don’t know how strong you are, but in our situation, definitely not. Why is this a show?

I do not understand your complaints about a particular topic that affects the topic of discussion. Since you allow yourself to state arguments that have nothing to do with our discussion. I'll let myself, too.

By the way, you have never provided any evidence to support your words, except for emotional and pompous statements.
Your words about my competence and experience in moderation have no support or confirmation. By the way, I question your experience in such projects, as I am an active, living and developing project, I was a paladin in the original project, I was a VP twice in other projects and held high positions from chief to coordinator in many other popular, living or now dead BC. I also declare that I was in the past a moderator, guardian, adviser and one of the top five management structures responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules and security of an online project with more than 11 years of experience, still alive, active and active, with online more than you can imagine dozens of times. As you can see, my experience and experience is not inferior to yours, and may even exceed it and certainly does not allow you to doubt my competence.
The attempt to present the facts as a lie from the GP is frankly weak.
Regarding the study of new information for me, thank you, I am studying and will definitely study many more new formulations and data that I need.
I will allow you to leave the last word and end this conversation, since you have decided to turn to emotions instead of a thorough clarification. I hope I have answered all your questions in detail and you will not have them again.

P.S. In order to stop your further negative actions, I remove from the open access the topic, laid out for a time for a popular explanation to players for what and how they will be punished, namely Mat (forum).
With respect, Third