Miraculis
[8]
2015-10-26 19:58:41
with 4 i disagree fundamentally
АтЭцЪ
[7]
2015-10-26 21:00:26
He contributed to the development of the project and was pleased to respond quickly.
GURREN-LAGANN
[7]
2015-10-26 21:03:10
In paragraph 4, it turns out that if I have 1 less anticrite than my opponent, then I will never be able to rinse it in principle?
Third
[8]
2015-10-27 07:39:37
GURREN-LAGANN
In paragraph 4, this means that if the opponent has 1 crit less than your anticrite, then he will never be able to utter you in principle.
DinomAn
[8]
2015-10-27 11:53:51
4.5 and 6 paras. operationally))
GURREN-LAGANN
[7]
2015-10-27 13:46:18
Third
But it's pretty stupid, because the principle of randomness should still be present in the game, and then they just took it out of the game and gave everything to the stats. Thus, if you are an artifact against you, then now you are definitely not going to do anything to him.
Third
[8]
2015-10-27 14:23:05
GURREN-LAGANN
On the contrary, many people swear at this “random principle” and were dissatisfied with it. . .
graver4ik
[8]
2015-11-18 05:57:04
thank you! noodles 7 won't critique me now