the administration hear people vargus without a blink of conscience leads claiming it's his wife snoopy and she's a dark persian

stop this nonsense

14:54 [akfenix] officially declare, my wife and 6-year-old daughter looked at the mess in the game and decided to start playing it)
My daughter, of course I will tell you.

against the tarmans. inconsistent position, when palms against the incas in the game, but for the tarmans. it's all one medal imho
if there is someone who has a lot of time, it is not a problem to make "beautiful" cartoons, it is clear to everyone who writes / reads here

against the tarmans. inconsistent position when palms against the incas in the game, but for the tarmans.
+

well, then we'll play with whole brothers and families of 10-20 people

the game is dominated by auls )

against Tarmans. inconsistent position when palms against Incas in the game, but for Tarmans. it's all one medal imho

These are different medals.
The Incas are a fighting structure of the Palas, which was in the old bq, due to the lack of light in principle. It was logical, but the idea automatically dies out as soon as light clans appear. Pals should play only the role of moderators, but not the combat structure of light. What we have here, palas cover the light in all manifestations, cartoonism, insults, no blocks, no silences, not even warnings, everything is fine. But since moderators do not want to perform their duties honestly, so in contrast to it, you need a dark structure of moriators to remove light favorites

Pels A list of cartoonists, please. And at least some facts of their leadership. Enough voice-over, for 30-40 years already

Framework [9] Inf. about Ramchik 2016-03-05 23:11:13
Pels Please list of multiguides. And at least some facts of their leadership. That's enough for 30-40 years.
That is precisely in order that there would be no backstopping in the absence of complete distrust of your structure and a proposal was made to introduce the structure of tarmans. You're kind of fussy. . . I was worried.

akfenix

As far as I remember, the introduction of the Tarman Institute into the BBK in no way added confidence to the moderators, but on the contrary, discredited this institution completely. For the Tarmans immediately began to oppose themselves to the Paladins, and so much so that they gave the same checks to all the VC only on the fact that the Paladins refused it, without actual verification. I recall the expression of Baron de insectomus Mucha: "In my territory any VC check will pass" (c). Maybe we shouldn't step on the old rake after all. We know, we swam

Akfenix , again slang. who's fussing? You want to help restore order, so indicate where it is and why it caused your suspicion. And who are Tarmans I do not know at all, I saw only a clan like this, but I did not notice something mystical in it

Maniac [9] Inf. about Maniac : Can you give any reasonable example?
Ramchik [9] Inf. about Ramchik 2016-03-05 23:11:13
Pels Please list of multiguides. And at least some facts of their leadership. That's enough talk,

Good. Fact #1.
The panda and its cartoons. As much as it was written and said, specific nicknames of the Panda cartoons were indicated, which he used for his heel and set up as frames in battle. While the Panda was walking behind the light, nothing was found, as soon as the GP screwed up and the Panda went against, everything was immediately found. Coincidence - fig there.

Fact #2.
Bone and Chosen. Here the VP wrote that it was business and everything is even, is it not because the Kostol walks behind the light? The chosen one walks only as a stand in the tower, in other battles almost does not appear, all the towers drain Kostoloma. What living Persian would do that?

Fact 3. Vargus and Snooppi.
Vargus himself does not deny driving a Persian wife. It was yesterday’s drop that he, with his dark cartoon, throws silence at the dark ones who threw them at the light ones. One Persian in the dark, the other in the light, very comfortable. Doesn't that fit under the "Character doesn't belong to the master" clause? If I’m not mistaken Vargus this Persian started to pull Guintaria from the boudoir when he had a muddle with mibas.
And more...
Insults in chat, with paladins online do not affect the light Persians, but immediately punish the dark. 20:32 The great queen of fools forgot to wash her mouth after the sick. 14:59 [Snoopy] to [NATALA] You must have sex problems. 14:59 [Snoopy] to [NATALA] does he not want the spires of the wili?
Are the Palams forbidden to punish the Lights because they are allies? Should the dark ones be punished immediately?
Tharmans are only needed to objectively punish the dark, as the Order does, but also the Light, for similar violations.
There are many more examples, these are only the most obvious. To prove, for lack of mechanisms, I can’t do anything, it should be done using their capabilities.

Pels

Mish, and now on the shelves:

1. The panda is in the block, a lot of chaos and other punishments, the investigation was after the fight for light. Unreasonable.

2. On Kostolom answered the VP, exhaustively imho. Unreasonable.

3. Vargus' confession to the studio. There is no such thing as "The character does not belong to the master." Did you stand behind Vargus when he was driving several characters? I don't think. Speculation. Unreasonable.

And more: 20:32 [I returned] to [NATALA] the great queen of stupid mouth forgot to wash after the patients - 2016-03-05 20:33:36 - Paladin "Maniac" imposed a spell of silence on "I returned with", for a period of 30 minutes - was punished. Unreasonable.
14:59 [Snoopy] to [NATALA] You must have sex problems. 14:59 [Snoopy] to [NATALA] does he not want the spires of the wili?
http://prnt.sc/abhtfi - issued a warning. If you look at paragraph 4 of the price, you will see that punishment is possible only after warning and continuing unworthy behavior. All according to the letter "law." Unreasonable.

“The Palamians were forbidden to punish the light because they were allies? And the dark ones should be punished at once? - Where does this information come from? Is this a false claim again?

I haven’t seen any specifics, just a little chatter.