Plus overall.
But against the increase in the difference between feral and turnip things, in fact, they should have the same characteristics, the only difference is that some get to work, quite long, and others donate easily and quickly, if finances allow. When voting for the project, I propose to charge 0.5 ecrs to the bank account, this will not violate the general financial balance, donors will also not suffer, and players will be pleased, there will be an incentive to vote.

class table for the hunter.
But no one has ever answered a simple question: For what ideological reasons, the hunter has three pluses in the table, and the destroyer has one? And nobody thinks it's a mistake?

+++

Musician
+ I agree

For what ideological reasons, the hunter has three pluses in the table, and the destroyer has one? Does that seem like a mistake to anyone? I>

Valer, call the table high, everything's fine. Dress up as a hunter, run for a week, then tell him how godlessly he rules, how experience rows tons. Maybe that's why there's not a single twist on 10K at all?
The lab/tower is long, the least damage is done in kneads, what else? To be killed by non-art destroyers? And so the destroyers climb everything that moves, let's also chop the dodges.

this is not the answer, this is again in general ... the hunter should stuff on the knight, the Templar. a lot of Cretes - put on a tank, only no one goes in tanks especially ... Father and he changed into a stock hunter and bought Ekrtopor. Destroyers add only the gladiator and the warrior, everything. Why is there not a single Knight who will fold the Destroyers?
Still want to hear ideological considerations about why the Hunter has three pluses in the table?

---